Development

New blog

The idea

In June, I started learning Rust. Why? Just out of curiosity. A system-level language with a lot of syntax sugar, new patterns, and approaches. So, I started with the Rust Book, got through half of it, and decided to build something real.

My previous blog was made with PHP 5.5 more than ~8 years ago. It wasn’t bad, but I completely quit PHP. I didn’t want to touch that old codebase. So I came to the conclusion: why not write a new one, this time in Rust?

Here it is. You’re welcome ;)

AI

I didn’t want to vibe-code it. However, I didn’t want to face all the obstacles by myself. So I used ChatGPT a lot, for almost every aspect of the development. I turned off Copilot and didn’t use Cursor. Because I wanted to write the blog “myself”. To feel it. At least in some merit. GTP was always in a separate browser tab. More like a helper, not an author.

Rust. First impression

Rust is wonderful, but it’s a system-level language. I had no real experience in this area before. Just a few simple C++ LeetCode problems, which gave me no real C++ knowledge. So it was a real challenge. But I wasn’t completely unarmed. I still remembered something about pointers, the heap, allocation, and other important system-level stuff. Though it was purely theoretical in my mind.

Read more

"Native code" label

How to detect if a function is a core part of browser API? This way:

  const a = () => {};
  a.toString(); // () => {}
  console.log.toString(); // function log() { [native code] }

You see? [native code] label. Sounds good, right?

  const a = () => {};
  const b = a.bind(null);
  b.toString(); // function () { [native code] }

Oops. But we still have this log name in the string snapshot.

Babel to EsBuild migration for Webpack

Recently I had some time to take a look at the performance of my pet project. One thing bothered me: the project is relatively small, but the bundle size was too big: 780 KiB. Whereas the project had only a few dependencies: react (~10 KiB), react-router (~70 KiB), react-dom (~90 KiB), dayjs (~3 KiB), lodash (~70 KiB). The bundle should not be that big for so few dependencies.

So I ran webpack-dev-analyzer and found a weird thing: the sum of the libs is 3 times smaller than the final bundle size. Then I decided to take a look at @statoscope/webpack-plugin. It was a good tool but it gave me the same result. The bundle has way too much trash.

Ok. Probably it’s just webpack wrappers over 300+ small modules. %cut% So I asked Perplexity - what can I do with it? Turned out all the proper options were already activated. So, I made a decision - it’s time to try esbuild. It made a huge impact on my work project, so I knew it could work out.

I knew that esbuild didn’t support a lot of stuff that babel supports. So I expected that it would take a day to migrate the codebase to esbuild. But surprisingly once I replaced babel-loader with esbuild-loader the build command worked out. The build didn’t work but the bundle was assembled without any errors.

Did it help? Nope. Instead of 780 KiB, I got ~1 MiB. Luckily I found out that there’s also EsbuildPlugin, which replaces TerserPlugin and works better. Added this line, it worked like a charm, and… Whoa! 280 KiB. That’s huuuge.

So I figured out - it worked. Now I have to find a way to fix the app (spoiler: it didn’t work at all).

Implicit React imports

React 17+ supports the possibility of avoiding adding import React from ‘react’ to every TSX-file. esbuild supports it too, but somehow it didn’t work out of the box. Solution:

  const esbuildLoader: RuleSetRule = {
    test: /\.(js|ts|tsx)$/,
    loader: 'esbuild-loader',
    exclude: /node_modules/,
    options: {
       target: 'es2020',
       minify: cfg.PROD,
+      // Support implicit React imports:
+      jsx: 'automatic',
+      jsxFactory: 'React.createElement',
+      jsxImportSource: 'react',
    } satisfies LoaderOptions,
  };

TSX-Control-Statements

I just removed the packages and all their <If/>s. I liked them though. There’s a plugin for Vite that adds their support. But I still use Webpack and the plugin works via string replacements, not via AST.

SourceMaps

To enable sourcemaps I had to disable EsbuildPlugin for development. Theoretically, it supports sourcemaps, but no matter what I did it didn’t work. I even debugged the package itself. Didn’t help. So I surrendered and enabled it only for the prod build.

TypeScript

EsBuild supports TypeScript syntax out of the box but it doesn’t check types. So it builds extremely fast but I need to know my errors. Solution:

  webpackConfig.plugins!.push(
    new ForkTsCheckerWebpackPlugin({
      typescript: {
        configFile: cfg.paths.TS_CONFIG,
      },
    })
  );

How does it work? The build and the type-checking processes are run in parallel. The 2nd doesn’t linger the 1st. You still can see the errors in the browser (and CLI) console. And visually too. Nice.

ES-Lint

For some reason, it stopped working. The solution was pretty simple:

  webpackConfig.plugins!.push(
    new ESLintPlugin({
      extensions: ['ts', 'tsx'],

Final results

  • File sizes
    • Before: 641 KiB + 234 KiB + 29.5 KiB (css) = 904.5 KiB
    • After: 221 KiB + 55 KiB + 8.1 KiB (o_O, css) = 284.1 KiB
    • After minifyIdentifiers: true (scary thing) & minifyWhitespace: true: 138 KiB + 44.2 KiB + 8.1 KiB = 190.1 KiB
  • DOMContentLoaded:
    • Before: 737ms
    • After: 231ms
    • After-2: 131ms
  • Build time: esbuild was ~3x faster

Afterthought

Taking a deeper look I found:

  • The main issue wasn’t in babel. The main issue was that I used inline-source-map for prod. I didn’t want to do it. Just a mistake. And both bundle analyzers didn’t notice that. Even when I manually looked at the file I barely found it (the horisontal scroll was too big). Fixing this issue dropped the file size 3x times even with babel.
  • esbuild has a better wrapper logic for a ton of tiny files than babel does.
  • Whitespace minification is quite important. GZip doesn’t eliminate the difference.
  • Name mangling is a beast. But be careful, it can easily break your app in runtime.
Read more

How to migrate Javascript webpack configuration to Typescript

It turned out that the newest versions (at least 5+) of webpack support Typescript out of the box. So the algorithm is next:

  • Create tsconfig.json at the root level. Content:
    {
      "compilerOptions": {
        "module": "CommonJS",
        "target": "ES5",
        "esModuleInterop": true,
        "checkJs": false,
        "strict": true,
      }
    }
    
  • Rename all *.js files to *.ts
  • Type all of them:
    • no more ugly require, use import.
    • webpack package has typings out of the box.
      • You may find these types useful: ConfigurationRuleSetRule
      • To enable devServer write this: 
        interface Configuration extends WebpackConfiguration {
          devServer?: WebpackDevServerConfiguration;
        }
        
    • Some of the popular plugins have types too.
    • Some of them don’t have types at all:
      • Create a *.d.ts file
      • Put there something like this:
        declare module 'postcss-assets' {
          export default function postcssAssets(opts: {
            basePath: string;
            relative: boolean;
          }): unknown;
        }
        
  • Make sure your webpack.config.ts file is placed at the root level. I mean exactly at the same spot where node_modules is. Otherwise, you won’t be able to build it. No compilerOptions helped me. 
  • Run webpack. It should work.

How to make a simple system.d service for a node.js server

Put this content:

[Unit]
Description={name}

[Service]
Type=simple
User={user}
ExecStart=/usr/bin/node {full-path-to-script}.js

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target

… somewhere as {name}.service, where:

  • {name} is the name of the service
  • {user} is the name of the user to run the script (optional)

… then:

  • run: this sudo ln -s /{full_path}/{name}.service /lib/systemd/system/{name}.service 
  • then this: sudo systemctl daemon-reload
  • then this: sudo systemctl enable {name}.service
  • and finally this: sudo systemctl start {name}

How does it work?

  • It starts the service on boot (see WantedBy section).
  • Using ExecStart command. Important: we specify the full path to node
  • SystemD remembers the PID of the new process and considers the service is ongoing until the process is died.
  • So any subsequent systemctrl start {name} won’t do anything if the previous process is alive.
  • This behavior is determined by Type=Simple